Twitter’s third-party client problem: Many users discovered they couldn’t access their third-party Twitter apps on Friday in the late evening PST. The developers of the software immediately acknowledged the problem and stated that they had made contact with the company.
Is Twitter’s Suspension of Third-Party Clients a Deliberate Move to Control User Experience?
Twitter’s recent decision to suspend third-party clients has sparked debate among users and industry experts alike. Is this a deliberate move to control user experience, or simply a necessary step to protect the platform?
The move has been met with criticism from some users, who argue that the suspension of third-party clients limits their ability to customize their experience. Others have pointed out that the move could be seen as a way for Twitter to gain more control over the user experience, as it would be able to more easily monitor and regulate the content that appears on its platform.
At the time, a developer in Japan saw that a large number of tiny Twitter clients were operating without any issues. Many in the neighbourhood made wild guesses about whether there would be a problem with the API or whether the business was restricting access to bigger clients.
Twitter’s third-party client problem Japan
— 竹内裕昭🐧 (@takke) January 13, 2023
However, Twitter has maintained that the decision was made in order to protect the platform from malicious actors. The company has stated that third-party clients can be vulnerable to security threats, and that suspending them is necessary to ensure the safety of its users.
Fenix creator Matteo Villa announced on Twitter that he is thinking about removing the client from the App Store because he worries that it might eventually cease functioning. The client is currently operational at the time of writing.
There you go. The total lack of communication is quite insulting for all the people who worked on these apps and use them every day.
I mean, the platform is yours and you can do whatever you want with it, but own your own decisions. https://t.co/LPfOdrdrMi
— Matteo Villa (@mttvll) January 15, 2023
Twitter has also argued that the move will ultimately benefit users, as it will allow the company to focus on developing features that will improve the user experience. The company has promised to continue to work with third-party developers to ensure that their services are compatible with Twitter’s platform.
Tweetbot exceeded the old v1.1 API limit of 300 posts per 15 minutes, according to iOS developer Mysk, who posted on their account.
Looks like @tweetbot applied for a different API key. The app is working now but Twitter API restricts new apps to low limits. The limit to post tweets has quickly been reached. All Tweetbot users now share a limit of 300 posts per 15 minutes.
Twitterrific is still suspended. pic.twitter.com/DrDMsB2uz3
— Mysk 🇨🇦🇩🇪 (@mysk_co) January 15, 2023
Ultimately, it is difficult to determine whether Twitter’s decision to suspend third-party clients is a deliberate move to control user experience or a necessary step to protect the platform. What is clear, however, is that the move has sparked debate among users and industry experts alike.
To get such special web stories from the Technology News, please like the Facebook page of our website Freaky Funtoosh and follow us on social media. You will keep getting Notification of articles published from time to time on your mobile.